Institution record

Metropolitan Capital B&T

Head office
Chicago, IL
FDIC certificate
57488
Assets
$235M

Last filed grade

Historical record
Grade F
Score0.0/ 100
Peer group
Banks, Under $300M
Other peers
1,881
Quarter ending
December 31, 2025

The institution’s overall result is better than 0.0 percent of the 1,881 other banks with assets of under $300M, counting half of tied peers. This comparison uses filed data for the quarter ended December 31, 2025. It is not a verdict or forecast.

Grade bands
Grade A
80 to 100
Grade B
50 to under 80
Grade C
20 to under 50
Grade D
5 to under 20
Grade F
0 to under 5

About 20 percent receive A, 30 percent B, 30 percent C, 15 percent D and 5 percent F within each group of institutions of the same type and similar size. These shares are built into the grading rules, though ties can change them. C is in the middle. A letter is a relative comparison, not a verdict or forecast.

Historical insurance record

FDIC insured at closure

The insurance status shown applies to this bank’s historical record. The FDIC has already closed the bank. Use the adjacent links to review the regulator record and closure data.

FDIC institution record

Last filed ratios

The raw ratio and percentile, its position among reporting peers, are separate numbers. A higher percentile means a more favorable comparison with reporting institutions of the same type and similar size. It accounts for each ratio’s direction, rather than indicating a larger raw ratio or a personal insurance percentage.

Deposits above the insured limit

22.3%
Peer percentile40.3 / 100

22.3 percent of deposits exceed the FDIC insurance limit, better than 40.3 percent of banks under $300 million in assets. A lower uninsured share means less depositor money could face losses if the institution closes.

Unrealized bond losses vs equity

Not available

Peer comparison unavailable

This ratio cannot be calculated because required data is missing or the amount being divided by is zero or negative. An unavailable value does not mean zero or a poor result. The grade adjusts the weights of the remaining available measures.

Commercial real estate vs capital

300.2%

Basis: total risk-based capital

Peer percentile3.2 / 100

Commercial real estate loans equal 300.2 percent of total risk-based capital, covering construction, non-owner-occupied commercial and multifamily loans but excluding owner-occupied property; the ratio can exceed 100 percent. 3.2 percent of similar banks have a higher concentration; losses in one lending type can affect more of the bank’s finances at once.

Problem loans vs capital (Texas ratio)

152.5%
Peer percentile0.1 / 100

The Texas ratio is 152.5 percent, comparing seriously overdue loans and foreclosed real estate with equity and funds set aside for loan losses. This is better than 0.1 percent of similar banks.

Core capital vs assets

2.1%
Peer percentile0.1 / 100

2.1 percent of total assets is tier 1 capital, meaning funds provided by the bank’s owners rather than deposits and borrowings. Its core capital ratio is better than 0.1 percent of similar banks, providing a larger cushion to absorb losses before depositors are affected.

Brokered deposits

22.0%
Peer percentile2.6 / 100

Brokered deposits, gathered through third-party deposit brokers, make up 22.0 percent of total deposits and are sensitive to interest rates. 2.6 percent of similar banks have a higher share, though some banks use this funding deliberately.

Return on assets

-6.92%
Peer percentile0.4 / 100

Return on assets is -6.92 percent, measuring annualized net income as a share of average assets. This return is better than 0.4 percent of similar institutions, while profits add to capital and losses reduce it.

Last filed summary

Metropolitan Capital B&T in Chicago, IL, with $235M in assets, receives the letter F, better than 0.0 percent of the 1,881 other banks under $300 million in assets. Some of this bank's ratios are not reported in its filing. Its score uses the available ratios, with the weights rescaled among them, and each appears below with its comparison. The letter compares this bank with banks of similar size and is not a verdict. Figures are from FDIC Call Report data for the quarter ending December 31, 2025.

Grade history

Each point shows the institution’s grade for its filed quarter, compared with institutions of similar size and type. Size groups and their members may change between quarters. The line connects recorded comparisons, not a trend for an unchanged group. It does not forecast.

Score / 100

If content extends beyond view, scroll sideways. For keyboard scrolling, focus the table or chart and use arrow keys.

Grade history0205080100Mar 2022Sep 2023Dec 2025
History data
Grade history
Quarter endingScoreGrade
Mar 31, 20227.5D
Jun 30, 202211.8D
Sep 30, 202215.2D
Dec 31, 202224.9C
Mar 31, 202333.1C
Jun 30, 202316.3D
Sep 30, 202336.0C
Dec 31, 202326.1C
Mar 31, 202435.4C
Jun 30, 202423.8C
Sep 30, 202420.6C
Dec 31, 20246.1D
Mar 31, 20253.6F
Jun 30, 20251.8F
Sep 30, 20251.5F
Dec 31, 20250.0F

Sources and dates

Quarter ending
December 31, 2025